chinese government can be really smart to setup rules (水城百事)
To Conquer Wind Power, China Writes the Rules
Doug Kanter for The New York Times
Employees at work on wind turbine hubs at the Gamesa factory in Tianjin, China, in October.
By KEITH BRADSHER
Published: December 14, 2010
RECOMMEND
TWITTER
COMMENTS (29)
E-MAIL
SEND TO PHONE
PRINT
SINGLE PAGE
REPRINTS
SHARE
TIANJIN, China — Judging by the din at its factory here one recent day, the Spanish company Gamesa might seem to be a thriving player in the Chinese wind energy industry it helped create.
Multimedia
Document
From the Chinese Government, a Requirement on Wind Farms
Graphic
Wind Turbine Makers in China
Add to Portfolio
General Electric Co
Morgan Stanley
Go to your Portfolio »
Readers' Comments
Share your thoughts.
Post a Comment »
Read All Comments (29) »
But Gamesa has learned the hard way, as other foreign manufacturers have, that competing for China’s lucrative business means playing by strict house rules that are often stacked in Beijing’s favor.
Nearly all the components that Gamesa assembles into million-dollar turbines here, for example, are made by local suppliers — companies Gamesa trained to meet onerous local content requirements. And these same suppliers undermine Gamesa by selling parts to its Chinese competitors — wind turbine makers that barely existed in 2005, when Gamesa controlled more than a third of the Chinese market.
But in the five years since, the upstarts have grabbed more than 85 percent of the wind turbine market, aided by low-interest loans and cheap land from the government, as well as preferential contracts from the state-owned power companies that are the main buyers of the equipment. Gamesa’s market share now is only 3 percent.
With their government-bestowed blessings, Chinese companies have flourished and now control almost half of the $45 billion global market for wind turbines. The biggest of those players are now taking aim at foreign markets, particularly the United States, where General Electric has long been the leader.
The story of Gamesa in China follows an industrial arc traced in other businesses, like desktop computers and solar panels. Chinese companies acquire the latest Western technology by various means and then take advantage of government policies to become the world’s dominant, low-cost suppliers. It is a pattern that many economists say could be repeated in other fields, like high-speed trains and nuclear reactors, unless China changes the way it plays the technology development game — or is forced to by its global trading partners.
Companies like Gamesa have been so eager to enter the Chinese market that they not only bow to Beijing’s dictates but have declined to complain to their own governments, even when they see China violating international trade agreements.
Even now, Gamesa is not crying foul — for reasons that are also part of the China story. Although the company’s market share in China has atrophied, the country’s wind turbine market has grown so big, so fast that Gamesa now sells more than twice as many turbines in China as it did when it was the market leader five years ago.
So as Gamesa executives see it, they made the right bet by coming to China. And they insist that they have no regrets about having trained more than 500 Chinese machinery companies as a cost of playing by Beijing’s rules — even if those rules have sometimes flouted international trade law. It is simply the table stakes of playing in the biggest game going.
“If we would not have done it, someone else would have done it,” said Jorge Calvet, Gamesa’s chairman and chief executive.
Entry Into China
Gamesa, an old-line machinery company that entered the wind turbine business in 1994, is a modern Spanish success story.
Its factories in Pamplona and elsewhere in Spain have produced wind turbines installed around the world. With sales of $4.4 billion last year, Gamesa is the world’s third-largest turbine maker, after Vestas of Denmark, the longtime global leader, and G.E.
With its relatively low Spanish labor costs, Gamesa became an early favorite a decade ago when China began buying significant numbers of imported wind turbines, as Beijing started moving toward clean energy. Gamesa also moved early and aggressively to beef up sales and maintenance organizations within China, amassing 35 percent of the market by 2005.
But Chinese officials had begun to slip new provisions into the bidding requirements for some state-run wind farms, requiring more and more of the content of turbines to be equipment produced within China — not imported.
Those piecemeal requirements soon led to a blanket requirement. On July 4, 2005, China’s top economic policy agency, the National Development and Reform Commission, declared that wind farms had to buy equipment in which at least 70 percent of the value was domestically manufactured.
“Wind farms not meeting the requirement of equipment localization rate shall not be allowed to be built,” stated the directive, known as Notice 1204.
1 2 3 NEXT PAGE »
COMMENTS (29)
E-MAIL
PRINT
SINGLE PAGE
REPRINTS
Experience the new Times app for iPadTM, now with all the sections, articles, photos and video you expect from The New York Times.
Ads by Google what's this?
2010 Wind Power Report
4 wind energy companies set to soar
in 2010 and beyond. Free report.
www.InvestmentU.com/Wind_Stocks
Get Free E-mail Alerts on These Topics
China
Wind Power
Energy and Power
Log In With Facebook
Log in to see what your friends are sharing on nytimes.com. Privacy Policy | What’s This?
What’s Popular Now
Richard C. Holbrooke, Giant of Diplomacy, Dies at 69
Ben Franklin’s Nation
MOST POPULAR - BUSINESS DAY
E-MAILEDBLOGGEDVIEWED
No Jobs? Young Graduates Make Their Own
A Secretive Banking Elite Rules Trading in Derivatives
Time Warner Views Netflix as a Fading Star
Panel Set to Study Safety of Electronic Patient Data
DealBook: Speculators Are Eager to Bet on Madoff Claims
On the Road: The Room Is Booked, Until the Hotel Says It Isn’t
Billionaire Backs a Gas-Electric Hybrid Car to Be Built in Russia
Web Focus Helps Revitalize The Atlantic
When Wrinkle-Free Clothing Also Means Formaldehyde Fumes
Corner Office: An Interview Is More Than a Social Call
Go to Complete List »
A Facebook "welcome" that may not be
Also on NYTimes.com
Top test scores from Shanghai stun educators
U.S. revises report on commercial colleges
ADVERTISEMENTS
Find your dream home with
The New York Times Real Estate
Fan The New York Times on Facebook
The new issue of T is here
See the news in the making. Watch TimesCast, a daily news video.
Advertise on NYTimes.com
Ads by Google what's this?
2010 Wind Power Report
4 wind energy companies set to soar
in 2010 and beyond. Free report.
www.InvestmentU.com/Wind_Stocks
INSIDE NYTIMES.COM
SPORTS »
Flashy Goal Is Nothing New for a Rookie
BUSINESS »
The Room Is Booked, Until the Hotel Says It Isn’t
OPINION »
Bloggingheads: Socialism U.S.A.?
A debate over whether President Obama’s policies are socialistic.
ARTS »
Mickey Moves to Another Screen
OPINION »
A Fatal Blow to Obama’s Health Law?
A Room for Debate forum on a federal judge’s decision to reject the insurance mandate.
SCIENCE »
Real Evidence for Diets That Are Just Imaginary
U.S. »
From the Delta to Winter’s Deep Blues
TELEVISION »
As Larry King Says Goodbye, People Talk
HEALTH »
Untangling the Myths About Attention Disorder
OPINION »
Fish: Value of Higher Education Made Literal
The privatization of higher education continues apace, as evidenced by a new report from England.
N.Y. / REGION »
‘Good Luck’ Sounds Like A Goodbye
OPINION »
Tim and Nina Zagat: Adding Fairness to the Tip
Home World U.S. N.Y. / Region Business Technology Science Health Sports Opinion Arts Style Travel Jobs Real Estate Autos Back to Top
Copyright 2010 The New York Times Company Privacy Terms of Service Search Corrections RSS First Look Help Contact Us Work for Us Advertise Site Map
关注水城微信, 实现微信发帖,搜索。微信号:kwcg519, 或公众号搜“水城百事”
登录后可以通过微信/Facebook/Twitter/email进行分享
Complete thread:
-
chinese government can be really smart to setup rules
-
China Writes the Rules on Wind Power
;
10-12-14,18:13
(#50432)
Reply
(水城百事)
-
interesting
-
8888999
;
10-12-14,18:51
(#50442)
Reply
-
