<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>滑铁卢华人, 水城百事论坛</title>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/</link>
<description>水城社区-Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge &amp; Guelph华人的网上家园</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>那你还是没看懂。中国也是面临类似美国的问题</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 匿名, Monday, February 09, 2026, 17:48:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514677</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514677</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 17:48:06 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>匿名</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>制度劣势。欧洲类似于社会主义</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 匿名, Monday, February 09, 2026, 17:44:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514676</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514676</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 17:44:16 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>匿名</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>美国的工业机器人在最初是大幅领先日德的，因为造成工人失业被社会抵制，不敢全面普及，后来让位日德瑞士</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 匿名, Monday, February 09, 2026, 17:37:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514675</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514675</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 17:37:55 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>匿名</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>美国也没这么卷的。都是中国逼的。现在中国就喜欢搞赢家通吃那一套。什么清场式领先。这搁谁不急眼啊。只能道义放两旁了</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 华西不高兴, Monday, February 09, 2026, 17:29:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514674</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514674</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 17:29:32 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>华西不高兴</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>没有中国也一样。资本家不养闲人。而美国搞社会主义难度非常大。加拿大在这方面有优势。比如突然宣布全民基本收入，加拿大不会怎么样。美国会天都塌了</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 匿名, Monday, February 09, 2026, 17:13:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514670</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514670</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 17:13:49 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>匿名</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>本来不至于。美国如果垄断新技术的话。可以慢慢完善法治保护人类的利益。可是现在有了中国。一切都不可能温文尔雅。只能图穷匕见了。谁更无耻谁就能领先。而领先远比人文关怀重要。活下来才有其它。</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 华西不高兴, Monday, February 09, 2026, 16:58:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514666</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514666</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 16:58:30 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>华西不高兴</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>这是必然到来的事实，程序员们自掘坟墓自毁长城，这事已经做完了。什么悖论不悖论的。下面是各国政治人物的考量了。是让很多人类饥寒交迫无家可归，还是吃大锅饭，全民收入</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 匿名, Monday, February 09, 2026, 16:08:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514645</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514645</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 16:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>匿名</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>AI导致大规模失业的说法是不是一个悖论？
现阶段AI存在的意义就是让更多的人使用它才能创造财富，如果人类大量失业那么ai的需求也会大量减少，现阶段人类和ai应该是一荣俱荣，一损俱损才对吧？</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Posting by 匿名, Monday, February 09, 2026, 15:55:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514644</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1514644</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 15:55:03 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>匿名</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>