<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>滑铁卢华人, 水城百事论坛</title>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/</link>
<description>水城社区-Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge &amp; Guelph华人的网上家园</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
<title>这种法案怎么提交上去的，才是关键。</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 匿名, Wednesday, September 10, 2025, 12:49:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1492303</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1492303</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 12:49:25 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>匿名</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>其实只要是类似婚姻的稳定关系。可以保护和承认。但是大多数都不是。参见重庆澡堂事件。还有这里的drama远多于异性恋。异性恋至少有孩子帮助稳定维持关系。而同性不存在这个纽带。所以分分合合全是轮肾不论心。这要是立法保护。几个月离一次结一次。执法部门要怎么管。</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Reply by 华西不高兴, Wednesday, September 10, 2025, 12:14:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1492302</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1492302</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 12:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>华西不高兴</dc:creator>
</item>
<item>
<title>香港立法会周三大比数否决《同性伴侣关系登记条例草案》，以14票赞成、71票反对、1票弃权，未能够通过二读，是“完善选举制度”后，本届立法会首条被否决的政府法案。</title>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Posting by 匿名, Wednesday, September 10, 2025, 12:06:</em></p><p>[ No text ]</p>]]></content:encoded>
<link>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1492300</link>
<guid>http://www.kwcg.ca/forum/index.php?id=1492300</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 12:06:06 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:creator>匿名</dc:creator>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>